WG
WEYCO GROUP INC (WEYS)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 net sales were $58.2M, down from $63.9M in Q2 2024 and $68.0M in Q1 2025 as retailers stayed cautious and consumer discretionary demand softened amid tariff uncertainty .
- Diluted EPS was $0.24 versus $0.59 last year and $0.57 in Q1; operating income fell to $3.9M from $6.7M last year as gross margin compressed to 43.3% (from 43.9% YoY and 44.6% in Q1) largely due to incremental tariffs .
- Management raised U.S. selling prices effective July 1 and outlined tariff mitigation (pre‑buy inventory, supplier cost reductions, sourcing diversification), yet emphasized tariffs remain fluid, adding near‑term margin uncertainty .
- Balance sheet remains strong: $77.4M cash at quarter end and ~$83.8M cash plus marketable securities; no revolver debt; Board declared a $0.27 quarterly dividend payable Sept 30, 2025 .
- Catalysts: tariff reset decisions mid‑August, H2 pricing impact, BOGS fall launches and outdoor demand normalization; dividend continuity supports downside protection while tariff path and consumer sentiment drive near-term stock reaction .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Pricing action implemented July 1 and supplier cost concessions secured; management moved select styles out of China and continued diversification (China 60%, India 14%, Vietnam 10%, Cambodia 10%) to mitigate tariff impact .
- Liquidity and capital returns: cash + marketable securities of ~$83.8M, no debt on $40M revolver; $0.27 dividend declared, following a track record of returns (special $2.00 in Nov 2024) .
- Product initiatives: BOGS fall introductions (seamless construction; expansion into year‑round work category) and cleaner retailer inventories position the brand for potential H2 traction .
What Went Wrong
- Broad demand softness: Wholesale net sales fell to $45.6M, with Nunn Bush −11%, Stacy Adams −10%, Florsheim −5%, BOGS −14% as retailers tightened inventory buys against weaker consumer spending .
- Margin pressure: Consolidated gross margin declined to 43.3%, wholesale gross margin to 37.6%, with tariffs eroding profitability; retail margin modestly lower at 66.6% .
- International drag: Florsheim Australia posted a $0.2M operating loss (vs. $0.2M profit last year) and weaker AUD reduced reported sales; effective tax rate spiked to 51.1% on a $1.1M valuation allowance at Florsheim Australia .
Financial Results
Consolidated quarterly results
Q2 year-over-year comparison
Segment breakdown (Q2)
KPIs and balance sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The tariff‑environment created headwinds for our business in second quarter… consumers pulled back on discretionary spending… higher tariff‑import costs set in, eroding our margins and reducing our profitability for the period” — Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr., Chairman & CEO .
- “We have taken various measures to minimize the impact… proactively bringing in a large amount of inventory ahead of the tariff effective dates… negotiated factory cost reductions… moved sourcing of certain footwear styles out of China… raised U.S. selling prices effective July 1, 2025” — Judy Anderson, CFO .
- “Prior to 2025, 75% of our factory base was located in China. We are actively working to further diversify our supply chain… we’re proud of the quality and value we provide… we expect the challenging environment to persist through the second half of the year” — CEO .
- “In regards to our BOGS business… we are gearing up for a number of new fall product introductions… expanding the product line to be less dependent on cold weather demand… newly engineered products in the work category” — CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Inventory strategy and LIFO: Pre‑purchase benefits flowed through H1; inventories trending to normal levels in pairs, but dollar value may rise with 30% China tariff embedded in cost; company confirms LIFO accounting .
- Sourcing diversification detail: Open orders now ~60% China, ~14% India, ~10% Vietnam, ~10% Cambodia; dual‑sourced SKUs enable flexibility if tariffs shift; strong relationships and balance sheet to “weather the storm” .
- Retailer creditworthiness: Monitoring closely in a shaky environment; no immediate distress among major customers; approach balances support with prudence to maintain business while limiting risk .
- Australia/South Africa strategy: Australia remains strategically important with ~30 Florsheim stores and dominant market share; South Africa mostly wholesale, profitable; continued focus on wholesale recovery and SG&A efficiencies .
Estimates Context
S&P Global Wall Street consensus for Q2 2025 was unavailable for WEYS; therefore, a beat/miss vs estimates cannot be determined. Actuals are provided below for reference.
*Values retrieved from S&P Global; consensus data unavailable.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The quarter’s compression in sales and margins was driven by tariffs and discretionary demand softness; management’s mitigation (pricing, supplier concessions, diversification) is underway but tariff volatility keeps near‑term margin visibility low .
- Wholesale softness was broad across brands; Florsheim remains relatively resilient while BOGS depends on fall/winter demand normalization; clean outdoor inventories and new product intros provide H2 optionality .
- Liquidity and capital returns underpin the equity story: ~$83.8M cash + marketable securities and no debt support continued dividends and opportunistic repurchases despite cyclical headwinds .
- Watch August tariff developments (China rate post‑Aug 12 and non‑China increases Aug 7): pricing integrity and dual‑sourcing provide levers, but margin path is linked to policy outcomes .
- Inventory normalization in pairs reduces risk; dollar value could rise with tariff‑inclusive costs—expect careful working capital management as sourcing shifts and pricing actions flow through .
- Australia/South Africa remain strategic, with brand strength and potential wholesale recovery; FX and macro conditions can affect reported results .
- Near‑term trading: sensitivity to tariff headlines and consumer confidence; medium‑term thesis: brand durability, pricing power, and diversified sourcing can restore margins as conditions stabilize .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong — Additional Detail
- Wholesale SG&A held flat YoY in Q2 ($13.1M vs $13.4M), demonstrating cost discipline despite fixed‑cost deleverage from lower sales .
- Retail conversion softness underscores competitive promotional landscape; management is investing in engagement tools while maintaining pricing integrity, potentially sacrificing near‑term volume for long‑term brand equity .
- Tax rate spike (51.1%) from a valuation allowance at Florsheim Australia significantly reduced net income; this is non‑operational, but highlights international earnings sensitivity and FX .
Additional Document References
- Q2 press release conference call logistics and replay details (for archival and ongoing monitoring) .
- Prior quarter results for trajectory context: Q1 2025 net sales $68.0M, EPS $0.57; Q4 2024 net sales $80.5M, EPS $1.04; 2024 full year demonstrated strong brand resilience despite weather/macro .